Managing Circadian Disruption due to Hospitalization: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the CircadianCare Inpatient Management System.

The objective of the present study was to test the effects of an inpatient management system (CircadianCare) aimed at limiting the negative impact of hospitalization on sleep by enhancing circadian rhythmicity. Fifty inpatients were randomized to either CircadianCare (n = 25; 18 males, 62.4 ± 1.9 years) or standard of care (n = 25; 14 males, 64.5 ± 2.3 years). On admission, all underwent a full sleep-wake evaluation; they then completed daily sleep diaries and wore an actigraph for the whole length of hospitalization. On days 1 (T0), 7 (T1), and 14 (T2, if still hospitalized), salivary melatonin for dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and 24-h skin temperature were recorded. In addition, environmental noise, temperature, and illuminance were monitored. Patients in the CircadianCare arm followed 1 of 3 schedules for light/dark, meal, and physical activity timings, based on their diurnal preference/habits. They wore short-wavelength-enriched light-emitting glasses for 45 min after awakening and short-wavelength light filter shades from 18:00 h until sleep onset. While the first, primary registered outcome (reduced sleep-onset latency on actigraphy or diary) was not met, based on sleep diaries, there was a trend (0.05 < p < 0.1) toward an advance in bedtime for CircadianCare compared to standard of care patients between T0 and T1. Similarly, DLMO time significantly advanced in the small group of patients for whom it could be computed on both occasions, with untreated ones starting from earlier baseline values. Patients sleeping near the window had significantly higher sleep efficiency, regardless of treatment arm. As noise fluctuation increased, so did the number of night awakenings, regardless of treatment arm. In conclusion, the CircadianCare management system showed positive results in terms of advancing sleep timing and the circadian rhythm of melatonin. Furthermore, our study identified a combination of environmental noise and lighting indices, which could be easily modulated to prevent hospitalization-related insomnia.

Effect of Morning Light Glasses and Night Short-Wavelength Filter Glasses on Sleep-Wake Rhythmicity in Medical Inpatients.

Sleep and circadian rhythm disorders are common amongst medical inpatients. They are caused by a mixture of factors, including noise, loss of habitual daily routines, and abnormal exposure to light, which tends to be insufficient in the day and too high at night. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of morning light therapy plus night short-wavelength filter glasses on sleep quality/timing, and sleepiness/mood over the daytime hours, in a group of well-characterized medical inpatients. Thirty-three inpatients were enrolled and randomized (2:1) to either treatment (n = 22; 13 males, 48.3 ± 13.3 years) or standard of care (n = 11; 8 males, 56.9 ± 12.9 years). On admission, all underwent a baseline assessment of sleep quality/timing and diurnal preference. During hospitalization they underwent monitoring of sleep quality/timing (sleep diaries and actigraphy), plus hourly assessment of sleepiness/mood during the daytime hours on one, standard day of hospitalization. Patients in the treatment arm were administered bright light through glasses immediately after awakening, and wore short-wavelength filter glasses in the evening hours. Treated and untreated patients were comparable in terms of demographics, disease severity/comorbidity, diurnal preference and pre-admission sleep quality/timing. During hospitalization, sleep diaries documented a trend for a lower number of night awakenings in treated compared to untreated patients (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 2.4 ± 1.3, p = 0.057). Actigraphy documented significantly earlier day mode in treated compared to untreated patients (06:39 ± 00:35 vs. 07:44 ± 00:40, p = 0.008). Sleepiness during a standard day of hospitalization, recorded between 09:30 and 21:30, showed physiological variation in treated compared to untreated patients, who exhibited a more blunted profile. The level of sleepiness reported by treated patients was lower over the 09:30-14:30 interval, i.e., soon after light administration (interaction effect: F = 2.661; p = 0.026). Mood levels were generally higher in treated patients, with statistically significant differences over the 09:30-14:30 time interval, i.e., soon after light administration (treatment: F = 5.692, p = 0.026). In conclusion, treatment with morning bright light and short-wavelength filter glasses in the evening, which was well tolerated, showed positive results in terms of sleepiness/mood over the morning hours and a trend for decreased night awakenings.

Inhibition of epoxyeicosatrienoic acid production in rats with cirrhosis has beneficial effects on portal hypertension by reducing splanchnic vasodilation.

UNLABELLED: In cirrhosis, 11,12-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET) induces mesenteric arterial vasodilation, which contributes to the onset of portal hypertension. We evaluated the hemodynamic effects of in vivo inhibition of EET production in experimental cirrhosis. Sixteen control rats and 16 rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis were studied. Eight controls and eight rats with cirrhosis were treated with the specific epoxygenase inhibitor N-(methylsulfonyl)-2-(2-propynyloxy)-benzenehexanamide (MS-PPOH; 20 mg/kg/day) for 3 consecutive days. Portal blood flow and renal and splenic resistive indexes were calculated through echographic measurements, while portal and systemic pressures were measured through polyethylene-50 catheters. Small resistance mesenteric arteries were connected to a pressure servo controller in a video-monitored perfusion system, and concentration-response curves to phenylephrine and acetylcholine were evaluated. EET levels were measured in tissue homogenates of rat liver, kidney, and aorta, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Urinary Na(+) excretion function was also evaluated. In rats with cirrhosis, treatment with MS-PPOH significantly reduced portal blood flow and portal pressure compared to vehicle (13.6 ± 5.7 versus 25.3 ± 7.1 mL/min/100 g body weight, P < 0.05; 9.6 ± 1.1 versus 12.2 ± 2.3 mm Hg, P < 0.05; respectively) without effects on systemic pressure. An increased response to acetylcholine of mesenteric arteries from rats with cirrhosis (50% effect concentration -7.083 ± 0.197 versus -6.517 ± 0.73 in control rats, P < 0.05) was reversed after inhibition of EET production (-6.388 ± 0.263, P < 0.05). In liver, kidney, and aorta from animals with cirrhosis, treatment with MS-PPOH reversed the increase in EET levels. In both controls and rats with cirrhosis, MS-PPOH increased urinary Na(+) excretion. CONCLUSION: In rats with cirrhosis, in vivo inhibition of EET production normalizes the response of mesenteric arteries to vasodilators, with beneficial effects on portal hypertension. (Hepatology 2016;64:923-930).

Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: the last therapeutic challenge.

Multidrug-resistant infections represent an increasing problem in the management of hospitalized patients worldwide. With respect to Gram-negative infections, carbapenems are an important antimicrobial class for the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta lactamase producers enterobacteriaceae. However, the emergence of novel ß-lactamases with direct carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity has contributed toward an increased prevalence of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae. Recent reports have described the spread of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae across the world. There are very few existing agents that can be used against these pathogens and there are limited options on the horizon. In recent years, the epidemiology of bacterial strains involved in the pathogenesis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis has also been changing rapidly. In this setting, we report the first case of nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae.

Use of sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation: a cost-benefit analysis while awaiting data on sorafenib safety.

UNLABELLED: The role of bridging therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the waiting list for liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. There is strong evidence to support the effectiveness of sorafenib in extending the time to progression of HCC. Using a Markov model, we compared two strategies: one using sorafenib as neoadjuvant therapy before LT (Strategy A), and the other using no bridging therapy in the first 6 months (Strategy B). Reference case: T2 HCC patient with compensated cirrhosis. The benefit of sorafenib in delaying time to HCC progression was expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) and taken from recently published randomized trials. The endpoints considered were: survival benefit measured in quality-adjusted life days (QALDs), transplant probability, costs (C) in euro, willingness to pay (WTP), and net health benefit (NHB), where NHB = survival benefit - C/WTP. The calculated WTP of sorafenib in Italy was 346 euro per QALD. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a median survival benefit of 94 QALDs (10% percentile = 38, 90% percentile = 210). In the base-case scenario (HR = 0.47, monthly dropout probability = 5%, median time to LT = 3 months), the gain in LT probability due to sorafenib was 5% and it increased proportionally with increasing median times to LT and decreasing HR. In the cost-benefit analysis, the incremental NHB of Strategy A versus Strategy B was 37 QALDs; it increased as sorafenib HR decreased and when median times to LT were shorter than 6 months, whereas for longer times it gradually dropped, particularly when Strategy B included effective locoregional treatments. CONCLUSION: Sorafenib neoadjuvant therapy is cost-effective by comparison with no therapy for T2-HCC patients waiting for LT, particularly for median times to LT under 6 months.

Nifedipine versus carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation: results of a controlled clinical trial.

The aim of this study was to compare nifedipine and carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The study included 50 patients who developed arterial hypertension after OLT. Twenty-five patients received nifedipine (group A), and 25 received carvedilol (group B). Patients were defined as intolerant to nifedipine or carvedilol if severe adverse effects developed. These patients stopped the first drug and were switched to the other one. Patients were defined as full responders to monotherapy if there was normalization of blood pressure, and they were defined as partial responders by the need to add a second antihypertensive drug, ramipril. The 2 groups of patients were similar for baseline conditions. At the end of the study, patients intolerant to monotherapy were 48% of group A and 12.5% of group B (P < 0.01). Full responders were 20% of group A and 33.33% of group B (P < 0.01). Partial responders were 22% of group A and 54.1% of group B (P < 0.01). The addition of ramipril normalized blood pressure in 19% of partial responders to monotherapy (75% in partial responders to nifedipine and 30% in partial responders to carvedilol, P < 0.01). In responders to either monotherapy or combined therapy, there was a significant improvement of renal function. In responders to carvedilol, but not in responders to nifedipine, the daily dose of tacrolimus at 1 year should be reduced to 50% compared to the baseline dose to maintain the blood trough level in the therapeutic range.

Comparison between two high-dose methylprednisolone schedules in the treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection in liver transplant recipients: a controlled clinical trial.

Intravenous methylprednisolone is used in most liver transplant centers as first-line therapy of acute hepatic cellular rejection in patients who undergo liver transplant. However, no controlled study has been performed to date to define the optimal dose and duration of the steroid regimen. The schedules that actually are used in most transplant centers are drawn from those that were developed empirically for the treatment of acute renal graft rejection. Thus, the aim of the study was to compare two schedules of steroid treatment of acute hepatic cellular rejection among those most widely used. Thirty-eight eligible patients with grade II or III acute hepatic cellular rejection were randomized to receive two different high-dose methylprednisolone schedules. Eighteen patients were randomized in group A (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d). Twenty patients were randomized in group B (intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days). The response to treatment was evaluated by means of a second liver biopsy. The treatment of group A proved to be more effective than treatment of group B. The resolution of acute hepatic cellular rejection was observed in 83.3% of cases in group A and 50.0% of cases in group B (P <.05). The treatment of group A proved to be safer also than treatment of group B. Patients randomized in group B showed a higher prevalence of infections (90.0% of cases versus 55.5% of cases; P <.01) mainly because of bacterial (80.0% versus 50.0%; P <.05) and viral (50.0% versus 16.6%; P <.05) agents. In conclusion, the study shows that intravenous administration of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone followed by a 6-day taper from 200 to 20 mg/d is more effective and safer than intravenous dose of 1,000 mg of methylprednisolone for three consecutive days in the treatment of acute cellular rejection in patients with liver transplantation.